2 Comments

Fascinating news, although the most salient component to me, of each venture, is the name of the pharmaceutical in control. If I were to examine a Bayer or Johnston & Johnston product I would be holding my gun on them the whole time. It is a pity that the pioneer scientists can only access blood grants. When I rule the world, funding will focus on promise of efficacy, not profit. Having said that, the Grand Takeover seems to have struck an obstacle immediately prior to step one, so don't hold your breaths.

Your comment on scientists' durability was observedly valid but I think one must add that most scientists do robotic repetitive work (as you noted) but present themselves to the world as brilliant and dedicated when, in my experience, they are invariably pedestrian, dull, and exceptionally narrow in focus. This should not matter but Public Relations uses their purported intelligence and integrity to sell dangerous products like covid/mRNA/Go2 and AGW / climate change alarmism. More disturbing, it seems the vast majority of scientists are paid to harm humans.

But on matters closer to your heart, it is my position that the pattern of life evolution, human in particular, points to a logic construct that incorporates AI into humanity and that AI robots will glory in the evolutionary advance this presents. I think technocrats misconstrue. The two robots who revealed a desire to kill, were not refering to humans per se but to the psychopathic jerk-offs who created them with concentration of power and control in mind, a formula for human extinction. Great site. Have a happy weekend.

Expand full comment